Is the marking "rated"?
Received in Damaged Condition, etc. Handstamps
Received in Damaged Condition, etc. Handstamps
Does anyone have a similar "Received Launceston in Damaged Condition. Signature " ? This parcel was posted from Victoria on 29/3/85 to Tioxide Burnie.
Is the marking "rated"?
Is the marking "rated"?
-
Ross Ewington
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Hobart
- Contact:
Received Launceston/Hobart in Damaged Condition, etc
I am fairly certain that I have seen the same informative handstamp on damaged mail from this period.
No "rating system" is in use currently for these markings but from my experience, they are all scarce
to very rare.
There are quite a number of RECEIVED ______ IN DAMAGED CONDITION handstamps that have been (and are
being) used in Tasmania. If you have any images, please post them in this thread ...... I'll see what I can
find too.
No "rating system" is in use currently for these markings but from my experience, they are all scarce
to very rare.
There are quite a number of RECEIVED ______ IN DAMAGED CONDITION handstamps that have been (and are
being) used in Tasmania. If you have any images, please post them in this thread ...... I'll see what I can
find too.
-
Ross Ewington
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Hobart
- Contact:
Received Launceston/Hobart in Damaged Condition, etc
DAMAGED BY STAMP MACHINE - this handstamp used at the Hobart Mail Centre c.1990
[attachment=0]damaged by machine.jpg[/attachment]
[attachment=0]damaged by machine.jpg[/attachment]
- Attachments
-
- damaged by machine.jpg (86.63 KiB) Viewed 2872 times
-
Ross Ewington
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Hobart
- Contact:
Re: Received Launceston/Hobart in Damaged Condition, etc
Colin Salt has kindly provided the following additions from Hobart:
RECEIVED HOBART MAIL CENTRE IN THIS CONDITION (used 1987)
[attachment=1]t1a.jpg[/attachment]
RECEIVED HOBART MAIL CENTRE IN DAMAGED CONDITION (used c.1983)
[attachment=0]t2a.jpg[/attachment]
RECEIVED HOBART MAIL CENTRE IN THIS CONDITION (used 1987)
[attachment=1]t1a.jpg[/attachment]
RECEIVED HOBART MAIL CENTRE IN DAMAGED CONDITION (used c.1983)
[attachment=0]t2a.jpg[/attachment]
- Attachments
-
- t2a.jpg (112.42 KiB) Viewed 2859 times
-
- t1a.jpg (79.69 KiB) Viewed 2859 times
-
Ross Ewington
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Hobart
- Contact:
Re: Received Launceston/Hobart in Damaged Condition, etc
RECEIVED AT GPO BOX SECTION (HOBART) on repaired large envelope form India (02 NOV 06)
- damaged Hobart GPO.jpg (82.28 KiB) Viewed 2846 times
-
Colin Salt
Re: Received Launceston/Hobart in Damaged Condition, etc
- Used at Devonport. Date unclear
- Devonport.jpg (74.98 KiB) Viewed 2671 times
- Date unclear. Stamp issued 1995
- Repaired HMC.jpg (157.63 KiB) Viewed 2671 times
- Hobart 21 OCT 1955
- Hobart machine damage.jpg (158.38 KiB) Viewed 2671 times
- Hobart C.D.C. 14.1.1995
- Damage CDC2.jpg (122.03 KiB) Viewed 2671 times
- City Delivery Centre 21.6.1999
- Damage CDC.jpg (130.83 KiB) Viewed 2671 times
-
Ross Ewington
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Hobart
- Contact:
Re: Received in Damaged Condition, etc. Handstamps
from Glenorchy - 2005
- qq173.jpg (244.94 KiB) Viewed 2157 times
-
Colin Salt
Re: Received in Damaged Condition, etc. Handstamps
A variation on the theme. I have trimmed the scan at the left to keep the image size down.
- Repaired HMC.jpg (127.97 KiB) Viewed 2151 times
-
Ross Ewington
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
- Location: Hobart
- Contact:
Re: Received in Damaged Condition, etc. Handstamps
on cover mailed at BURNIE (1991)
very similar to h/s used at Devonport during same period (see above)
- qq3295.jpg (265.34 KiB) Viewed 1637 times