APPARENT 'TIE' of BN163 to WESTWOOD rather than ROSEVALE?!

Post Reply
Message
Author
Ross Ewington
Posts: 2072
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

APPARENT 'TIE' of BN163 to WESTWOOD rather than ROSEVALE?!

#1 Post by Ross Ewington » Tue Nov 08, 2016 8:50 pm

This interesting item rose up through my 'to be listed' pile this evening. While I was getting excited about finding a new early date for the WESTWOOD Type 1a cds (by nearly 11 YEARS!!) I also noted the clear impression of BN163 which is currently assigned to ROSEVALE rather than this office (WESTWOOD used BN164 in the 1890s).
westwood.jpg
westwood.jpg (1.26 MiB) Viewed 529 times
Note that the card travelled to Launceston via HAGLEY ...... from Westwood, Rosevale is in the opposite direction!

Explanation anyone?

John Hardinge
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:47 pm

Re: APPARENT 'TIE' of BN163 to WESTWOOD rather than ROSEVALE?!

#2 Post by John Hardinge » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:44 pm

Not much doubt that 163 was Westwood's number. 164 to Rosevale, even though the official list has them reversed. This also occurred with Exeter/St Michael, the PMG list had them reversed. IN both cases, the two post offices opened on the same date and were very near one another. 163 is the scarcer of the two, so Westwood makes sense.

Post Reply