Thanks Jerry. I now realise and am a little embarrassed that I didn’t work that out.Jerry Weirich wrote: ↑Thu Aug 22, 2019 7:56 amUnhinged -- I didn't see that anyone else responded so I thought I would. The "NO 24" is not a code. It's part of the date for 24 November 1910.
Search found 13 matches
- Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:39 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Official and Private Perfins
- Topic: Just found my first Tasmania perfin.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14928
Re: Just found my first Tasmania perfin.
- Sun Aug 11, 2019 1:31 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Official and Private Perfins
- Topic: Just found my first Tasmania perfin.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 14928
Just found my first Tasmania perfin.
Is 24 the code for the town?
- Fri Jul 12, 2019 5:47 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Re: Multiple BN for Hobart
Hi all, Following up on Pete's comments re volume of mails in Tassie and Hobart in particular: The 1889 Post Office report includes the following volumes: "The mail matter circulated was 3,503,194 in-land letters, an increase of 59,820 on the previous year; 1,200,140 ship letters, an increase of 17...
- Mon Jul 01, 2019 2:37 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Re: Multiple BN for Hobart
Great info. Thanks John.John Hardinge wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:33 pm
Therefore, at various times in Hobart, numerals 48, 61, 62, 63, 64, 68, 74 and 75 all saw use. 61, 62, 63, 64, 74 and 75 were only used at Hobart, 48 and 68 at Hobart but also elsewhere.
Hope this helps.
- Mon Jul 01, 2019 2:34 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postmarks and Postal Markings to 1912
- Topic: Launseston?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9627
Re: Launseston?
Thanks John.John Hardinge wrote: ↑Sun Jun 30, 2019 2:33 pmYes it is a machine cancel. "C" of Launceston is slightly deformed.
- Thu Jun 27, 2019 10:44 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postmarks and Postal Markings to 1912
- Topic: Launseston?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9627
Re: Launseston?
John Hardinge could probably tell us but I am not certain. I think its a machine cancel, fig 108 in the Green Books. Maybe a Krag machine. They did gather dust and lint at times maybe due to the large volume of mail processed. Just a guess but it could be the die was clogged - in some cancels the s...
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 8:02 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postmarks and Postal Markings to 1912
- Topic: Launseston?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9627
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 6:31 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Re: Multiple BN for Hobart
Thanks Pete. I’ll give the bright light a try.
- Wed Jun 26, 2019 4:44 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Re: Multiple BN for Hobart
Is it possible from the date to identify what watermark these stamps may have or would I have to remove a stamp to be sure? Thanks again.
- Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:58 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postmarks and Postal Markings to 1912
- Topic: Launseston?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9627
Launseston?
Is it my imagination or does this postmark look like Launseston rather than Launceston?
- Mon Jun 24, 2019 9:09 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Re: Multiple BN for Hobart
Wonderful. Thanks very much Pete for your time.
Things are a lot clearer to me now.
Things are a lot clearer to me now.
- Mon Jun 24, 2019 5:05 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Re: Multiple BN for Hobart
Thanks very much for the detailed reply Pete but I must be missing a fundamental understanding of how the system worked, Why are more numbers required as the mail traffic increases? Why not use the same number if in the same town? Also, why is there a ‘prepaid’ mark on the envelopes. Surely the fran...
- Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:58 pm
- Forum: Tasmania - Postal History to 1912
- Topic: Multiple BN for Hobart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 21851
Multiple BN for Hobart
Hi all, my first post to this forum so please be gentle.
I’ve googled and read many posts but can’t find an answer to my question. In the first allocation why are there so many different barred numbers for Hobart? I have four letters all dated 1859 with numbers 48, 61, 74 and 75.
Thanks you.
I’ve googled and read many posts but can’t find an answer to my question. In the first allocation why are there so many different barred numbers for Hobart? I have four letters all dated 1859 with numbers 48, 61, 74 and 75.
Thanks you.