ABOVE AVERAGE STRIKES of R to RRR RATED POSTMARKS
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 5:55 pm
Clarity and completeness are important considerations when determining the quality of a postmark.
Some post offices cancelled the mail poorly 99% of the time (often for decades!) however other offices provide
postmark impressions with a high degree of clarity year in and year out.
Therefore, when determining what to pay for a rated postmark a simple rule is to pay a premium
for a good postmark from a PO which is notorious for poor strikes. On the other hand, one should pay
less for an example of a postmars which is "below average" for a specific office.
[There are other factors to consider such as date of usage, of ink, etc but these are not being dealt with in
this particular topic.]
So, how do we know what "average quality" is for any specific postmark? The answer can only really be found
out if you collect Tasmanian postmarks for many years however, perhaps this topic can provide a few shortcuts.
If you are an experienced collector of Tasmanian postmarks and have above average strikes of postmarks which
are usually found as "not that good" strikes, please post your images here as a reference for others.
Here's my first offering
RINGMA RD RLY STN / 25AU18 / TASMANIA (i.e. Ringarooma Road Railway Station)
[attachment=0]cj299.jpg[/attachment]
This RR rted postmark is very hard to find either complete and/or clear on the Pictorial issues as well as on Commonwealth
stamps up to when the office name changed to Legerwood in 1919. Strikes in violet ink appear to be more common
from 1912 on than in black.
I think this example is well above average ...can anyone beat it?
Some post offices cancelled the mail poorly 99% of the time (often for decades!) however other offices provide
postmark impressions with a high degree of clarity year in and year out.
Therefore, when determining what to pay for a rated postmark a simple rule is to pay a premium
for a good postmark from a PO which is notorious for poor strikes. On the other hand, one should pay
less for an example of a postmars which is "below average" for a specific office.
[There are other factors to consider such as date of usage, of ink, etc but these are not being dealt with in
this particular topic.]
So, how do we know what "average quality" is for any specific postmark? The answer can only really be found
out if you collect Tasmanian postmarks for many years however, perhaps this topic can provide a few shortcuts.
If you are an experienced collector of Tasmanian postmarks and have above average strikes of postmarks which
are usually found as "not that good" strikes, please post your images here as a reference for others.
Here's my first offering
RINGMA RD RLY STN / 25AU18 / TASMANIA (i.e. Ringarooma Road Railway Station)
[attachment=0]cj299.jpg[/attachment]
This RR rted postmark is very hard to find either complete and/or clear on the Pictorial issues as well as on Commonwealth
stamps up to when the office name changed to Legerwood in 1919. Strikes in violet ink appear to be more common
from 1912 on than in black.
I think this example is well above average ...can anyone beat it?