TRANSMISSION of TINSELLED POST CARDS PROHIBITED

Post Reply
Message
Author
Ross Ewington
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

TRANSMISSION of TINSELLED POST CARDS PROHIBITED

#1 Post by Ross Ewington » Thu Apr 01, 2010 1:31 pm

The transmission of tinselled postcards was prohibited from January 13, 1908.

This postcard addressed to J. Walch & Sons was mailed at Woodsdale on FE 1 08
and endorsed "Transmission of Tinselled Post Cards Prohibited" in red ink, most likely
at the Hobart GPO, and then directed to the DLO.

[attachment=1]tinsel ppc 1.jpg[/attachment]
[attachment=0]tinsel ppc 2.jpg[/attachment]


I have only ever seen this instruction applied by rubber stamp in red on such mail before.

In "Tasmania - The Informative and Instructional Markings" by Dr. P.G.R. Reid FRPSL (2008), he
records the earliest usage of the relevant instructional handstamp as being 3/02/1908 .... the
day after this postcard would have arrived at the Hobart GPO!!

Does anyone have an image or know of other examples of this instructional marking
applied in manuscript?
Attachments
tinsel ppc 2.jpg
tinsel ppc 2.jpg (47.21 KiB) Viewed 879 times
tinsel ppc 1.jpg
tinsel ppc 1.jpg (68.46 KiB) Viewed 879 times

John Hardinge
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:47 pm

Re: TRANSMISSION of TINSELLED POST CARDS PROHIBITED

#2 Post by John Hardinge » Thu Apr 01, 2010 2:07 pm

Have had two of the handstamp but have never seen it in mss

Malcolm Groom
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:12 am

Re: TRANSMISSION of TINSELLED POST CARDS PROHIBITED

#3 Post by Malcolm Groom » Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:55 pm

I have seen one other example of this instructional marking in manuscript. I discovered it in a $5 box at Gary Watson's in 1987. Unfortunately I cannot recall the addressee or origin.


It was in red ink and a few days before the handstamp was introduced. Do not have an image unfortunately.

Post Reply