postmark

Post Reply
Message
Author
John Piercy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:22 pm

postmark

#1 Post by John Piercy » Sun May 30, 2021 3:29 pm

IMG_20210530_0001.pdf
(101.47 KiB) Downloaded 530 times
Hi all, the attached scan shows a post mark with unusual horizontal bars any thoughts on this much appreciated thanks

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Re: postmark

#2 Post by admin » Sun May 30, 2021 3:57 pm

John, here is another example of Second Allocation BN 1 for comparison, if thats what it is.
Pete
2.1.jpg
2.1.jpg (10.69 KiB) Viewed 12991 times

John Piercy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:22 pm

Re: postmark

#3 Post by John Piercy » Sun May 30, 2021 5:16 pm

thanks Pete, the one penny looks to be more boxed rather than rounded ends and horizontal closer together
many thanks John.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:54 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania

Re: postmark

#4 Post by admin » Sun May 30, 2021 5:30 pm

John
Over inking and wear can make a fair difference but I am really not sure what it is.
Pete

Jerry Weirich
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:35 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: postmark

#5 Post by Jerry Weirich » Sun May 30, 2021 11:00 pm

John
I don't think your copy is BN 1.
On a BN 1, the numeral is centered directly in the middle of the bars. On your copy, the 1 is off center indicating to me that you have a two-digit numeral ending in 1.
Jerry

John Piercy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:22 pm

Re: postmark

#6 Post by John Piercy » Mon May 31, 2021 9:51 am

thanks Jerry

John Hardinge
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:47 pm

Re: postmark

#7 Post by John Hardinge » Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:55 pm

Sorry to disagree but definitely second allocation BN 1 of Antill Ponds.

John Piercy
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2018 4:22 pm

Re: postmark

#8 Post by John Piercy » Wed Jun 16, 2021 2:42 pm

thanks for your two replies John.

Jerry Weirich
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:35 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: postmark

#9 Post by Jerry Weirich » Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:42 pm

John Hardinge -- Would you please confirm that you looked at the stamp that John Piercy posted (1d red), not the stamp that Pete posted (2d green). Pete's copy is definitely BN 1, John's copy is not.

John Hardinge
Posts: 275
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:47 pm

Re: postmark

#10 Post by John Hardinge » Wed Jun 23, 2021 11:01 am

Sorry you are quite correct. Is not 1. It's quite a fat number for an imperf Chalon so is likely either a partial 11, 71 or 81.

Post Reply