1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

Post Reply
Message
Author
Ross Ewington
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

#1 Post by Ross Ewington » Wed Aug 07, 2013 2:38 pm

Could this be genuine?
jb1142.jpg
jb1142.jpg (169.67 KiB) Viewed 11082 times
The sans-serif SPECIMEN handstamp measures 21x4mm. A small piece of paper adheres to the back similar to
that you sometimes find with items from post office archives (but it could have also been removed from a collector's 'scrap book'
of course).

Malcolm Groom
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:12 am

Re: 1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

#2 Post by Malcolm Groom » Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:30 am

It is difficult to determine whether it is an 'official' hand stamp or not without an example on some other item. As it does not conform with anything recorded by Butler or material in the McCredie sale it would probably have to stay in the 'interesting possibilities' section until another one turns up.

Ross Ewington
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

Re: 1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

#3 Post by Ross Ewington » Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:31 am

thanks Malcolm - I'll keep it "in public view" just in case another example turns up ..... I won't be holding my breath though!

Postagedues
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:57 pm

Re: 1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

#4 Post by Postagedues » Fri Aug 07, 2015 7:45 am

Ross,

What are the dimensions of the 'SPECIMEN' overprint?

Ross Ewington
Posts: 2079
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:00 pm
Location: Hobart
Contact:

Re: 1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

#5 Post by Ross Ewington » Fri Aug 07, 2015 10:16 am

see above :o

Postagedues
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 1:57 pm

Re: 1d QV postal card with 'different' SPECIMEN handstamp?!

#6 Post by Postagedues » Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:43 pm

Ross,

It doesn't correspond to any listed in Samuel or Bendon's UPU book from 1975 (being revised and to be reissued soon) or in Kellow, Turner and McCredie).

I can't really help in clarifying the source of it for you or in identifying that overprint type.

Post Reply